...redundant, I know, but I can't spend three weeks with a book and not feel completely empty at the end. And it is hard to leave Amy Dorrit and Arthur Clennam but I have found an answer to my impulse to open to page one and begin rereading this Dickens right away. Watching the recent BBC adaptation has allowed me to stay in this world of poverty and riches and society and singular characters while moving on to the
Oliver Twist readalong. I am ambivalent about the adaptation, loving it one moment and not so loving it the next, but I can't stop watching. Claire Foy and Matthew Macfayden are excellent in their roles and Eddie Marsan as Mr. Pancks (although missing the hair Dickens gave him) is stealing the show. James Fleet as Frederick Dorrit and Pam Ferris as Mrs. General are not the characters I drew in my head but I love them so much from
The Vicar of Dibley and
Rosemary and Thyme, respectively, I have adjusted my vision.
Little Dorrit (the book) has all the qualities I have loved from my other readings of his work but they seem magnified here. His characters are richer. His social commentary is pitch perfect satire transcending his own time period. He is at his funniest and spookiest and the settings he creates never fail in their originality. And the emptiness I feel derives from how much I came to love so many of the characters...Amy, Arthur, Frederick, Lion, Mr. Meagles, Daniel Doyce, Pancks, John Chivery, Maggy...even Tattycoram and Flora.
I have picked up the habit of rereading Susan Hill's chapter on Dickens from Howards End is on the Landing during and after reading his works. I become overwhelmed by this need to see my feelings about Dickens reinforced by her words. She writes "He is mighty." Yes! She writes "...his literary imagination was the greatest ever..." Yes! She writes "After that, it is time I went back to Little Dorrit. Is it the best? I sometimes think so." At this moment, I know so.